The effects of entrepreneurial orientation on employee's intrapreneurial behavior: a value congruence perspective *

Журнал «KANT» №4(49) 2023 [стр. 174-182]

DOI: 10.24923/2222-243X.2023-49.32

Авторы: Zuo Wenjun, Postgraduate student, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Panikarova Svetlana Viktorovna, DSc of Economics, Professor, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg

Ключевые слова: entrepreneurial orientation; corporate entrepreneurship; intrapreneurial behavior; strategical renewal behavior; venture-creating behavior; polynomial regression with surface response.

Цитировать: Zuo W., Panikarova S.V. The effects of entrepreneurial orientation on employee's intrapreneurial behavior: a value congruence perspective // KANT. – 2023. – №4(49). – С. 174-182. EDN: KKVMED. DOI: 10.24923/2222-243X.2023-49.32

Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO) has emerged as an imperative driver for organizational innovation and corporate entrepreneurship. Grounded in the framework of Personal-Environment (P-E) Fit theory, the purpose of this study is to explores the influence of the fit between Organizational Entrepreneurial Orientation (OEO) and Individual Entrepreneurial Orientation (IEO) on the manifestation of employee intrapreneurial behavior (IB), specifically in the domains of strategic renewal behavior (SRB) and venture-creating behavior (VB). To empirically test our hypotheses, we conducted a study utilizing polynomial regression analysis with a surface response approach, drawing data from 292 valid survey responses obtained from employees within private enterprises in China. Scientific novelty: This study introduces a novel perspective by examining the interplay between IEO and OEO in the context of EO and corporate entrepreneurship. While scholars have recognized EO's significance in enhancing organizational competitiveness, this research underscores the importance of considering both individual and organizational dimensions in shaping EO's impact. Key Findings: (1) Both IEO and OEO positively contribute to IB, although the strength of this influence varies between the two subdimensions of IB; (2) The fit between IEO and OEO positively contributes to the manifestation of IB; (3) SRB and VB, as distinct subdimensions of IB, operate under unique stimulation mechanisms within the framework of P-E Fit theory.

* This work was prepared with the financial support of the China Scholarship Council (project no. 202310100005 "Labor Productivity and Creativity in the New Economy: An Intrapreneurship Perspective").

скачать

Литература:
1. Vallas S.P. Rethinking Post-Fordism: The Meaning of Workplace Flexibility // Sociological Theory. 1999. Vol. 17, № 1. P. 68-101.
2. Lazzarato M. Immaterial labor // Radical thought in Italy: A potential politics. 1996. Vol. 1996. P. 133-147.
3. Dentchev N. et al. Embracing the variety of sustainable business models: social entrepreneurship, corporate intrapreneurship, creativity, innovation, and other approaches to sustainability challenges // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016. Vol. 113. P. 1-4.
4. Contextualization in Chinese Management Research // Management and Organization Review. 2006. Vol. 2, № 1. P. 1-13.
5. Fieseler C., Bucher E., Hoffmann C.P. Unfairness by Design? The Perceived Fairness of Digital Labor on Crowdworking Platforms // Journal of Business Ethics. 2019. Vol. 156, № 4. P. 987-1005.
6. Elert N., Stenkula M. Intrapreneurship: Productive and Non-Productive // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications Inc, 2022. Vol. 46, № 5. P. 1423-1439.
7. Chatman J.A. Improving Interactional Organizational Research: A Model of Person-Organization Fit // The Academy of Management Review. 1989. Vol. 14, № 3. P. 333.
8. Covin J.G., Green K.M., Slevin D.P. Strategic Process Effects on the Entrepreneurial Orientation-Sales Growth Rate Relationship // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2006. Vol. 30, № 1. P. 57-81.
9. Lumpkin G.T., Dess G.G. Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance // The Academy of Management Review. 1996. Vol. 21, № 1. P. 135.
10. Wenjun Z. Intrapreneurship as a growing demand: igniting entrepreneurial mindset to fuel employees' strategic renewal behavior // Human Progress. 2023. Vol. 9, № 3. P. 13.
11. Kraus S. et al. Individual entrepreneurial orientation and intrapreneurship in the public sector // International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 2019. Vol. 15, № 4. P. 1247-1268.
12. Mahmoud M.A., Ahmad S., Poespowidjojo D.A.L. Intrapreneurial behavior, big five personality and individual performance // Management Research Review. 2020. Vol. 43, № 12.
13. Bandura A. Social learning theory. // Social learning theory. Oxford, England: Prentice-Hall, 1977. P. viii, 247-viii, 247.
14. Yarberry S., Sims C. The Impact of COVID-19-Prompted Virtual/Remote Work Environments on Employees' Career Development: Social Learning Theory, Belongingness, and Self-Empowerment // Advances in Developing Human Resources. 2021. Vol. 23, № 3. P. 237-252.
15. Taskiran G., IYiGun N.O. The Relationship between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Research in the Hospitality Industry // Procedia Computer Science. 2019. Vol. 158. P. 672-679.
16. Luu T.T. Fostering green service innovation perceptions through green entrepreneurial orientation: the roles of employee green creativity and customer involvement // International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 2022. Vol. 34, № 7. P. 2640-2663.
17. Yamin M.A.Y. Examining the role of transformational leadership and entrepreneurial orientation on employee retention with moderating role of competitive // Management Science Letters. 2020. P. 313-326.
18. Iqbal S. et al. Linking Entrepreneurial Orientation with Innovation Performance in SMEs; the Role of Organizational Commitment and Transformational Leadership Using Smart PLS-SEM // Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13, № 8. P. 4361.
19. Gawke J.C., Gorgievski M.J., Bakker A.B. Measuring intrapreneurship at the individual level: Development and validation of the Employee Intrapreneurship Scale (EIS) // European Management Journal. 2019. Vol. 37, № 6. P. 806-817.
20. Ashforth B.E., Mael F. Social Identity Theory and the Organization // The Academy of Management Review. 1989. Vol. 14, № 1. P. 20.
21. Miller V.D. et al. Reconsidering the Organizational Identification Questionnaire // Management Communication Quarterly. 2000. Vol. 13, № 4. P. 626-658.
22. Langkamp Bolton D., Lane M.D. Individual entrepreneurial orientation: development of a measurement instrument // Education + Training. 2012. Vol. 54, № 2/3. P. 219-233.
23. Edwards J.R. Person-environment fit in organizations: An assessment of theoretical progress // The Academy of Management Annals. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 2008. Vol. 2. P. 167-230.
24. Edwards J.R., Parry M.E. On the Use of Polynomial Regression Equations As An Alternative to Difference Scores in Organizational Research // Academy of Management Journal. 1993. Vol. 36, № 6. P. 1577-1613.
25. Shanock L.R. et al. Polynomial Regression with Response Surface Analysis: A Powerful Approach for Examining Moderation and Overcoming Limitations of Difference Scores // Journal of Business and Psychology. 2010. Vol. 25, № 4. P. 543-554.
26. Podsakoff P.M. et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. // Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003. Vol. 88, № 5. P. 879-903.
27. Tett R.P., Guterman H.A. Situation Trait Relevance, Trait Expression, and Cross-Situational Consistency: Testing a Principle of Trait Activation // Journal of Research in Personality. 2000. Vol. 34, № 4. P. 397-423.
28. Stewart G.L., Barrick M.R. Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediatig Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type // Academy of Management Journal. 2000. Vol. 43, № 2. P. 135-148.

Влияние предпринимательской ориентации на интрапренерское поведение сотрудника: перспектива соответствия ценностей *

Authors: Цзо Вэньцзюнь, аспирант, Институт экономики и управления, Уральский федеральный университет имени первого Президента России Б.Н. Ельцина, Екатеринбург, Паникарова Светлана Викторовна, доктор экономических наук, профессор, Институт экономики и управления, Уральский федеральный университет, Екатеринбург

Keywords: предпринимательская ориентация; корпоративное предпринимательство; интрапренёрное поведение; стратегическое обновление; создание бизнеса; полиномиальная регрессия с поверхностным откликом.

Предпринимательская ориентация (ЕO) вышла на передний план как критическая стратегическая необходимость для стимулирования инноваций и корпоративного предпринимательства. Основываясь на теории соответствия личности организации (P-E Fit), в данном исследовании анализируется влияние организационной предпринимательской ориентации (OEO) и индивидуальной предпринимательской ориентацией (IEO) на проявление интрапренёрного поведения сотрудников (IB), конкретно в областях стратегического обновления (SRB) и создания бизнеса (VB). Для эмпирической проверки наших гипотез мы использовали анализ полиномиальной регрессии с исследованием поверхности отклика, по данным опроса 292 сотрудников частных предприятий в Китае. Основные результаты: (1) Как IEO, так и OEO положительно влияют на IB, хотя сила этого влияния различается между двумя подизмерениями IB; (2) Соответствие между IEO и OEO положительно влияет на проявление IB; (3) SRB и VB, как разные подизмерения IB, функционируют на основе уникальных механизмов стимулирования в рамках теории P-E Fit. Научная новизна заключается в исследовании взаимодействия между IEO и OEO в контексте EО и корпоративного предпринимательства. В то время как ученые признают важность EО в увеличении конкурентоспособности организации, данное исследование подчеркивает важность учета как индивидуальных, так и организационных измерений в формировании влияния EО.

* Данная работа подготовлена при финансовой поддержке Китайского стипендиального совета (проект №202310100005 "Производительность труда и креативность в новой экономике: перспектива внутреннего предпринимательства").